PROCEPT CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT: A METICULOUSLY PAINSTAKING INVESTOR GUIDE [2026]

THE LAW OFFICES OF TIMOTHY L. mILES

TIMOTHY L. MILES

(855) TIM-M-LAW (855-846-6529)

[email protected]

(24/7/365)

Timothy L. Miles | Free Case Evaluation
Take Action: Call Today
"It will be the only call you need to make."
SUBMIT YOUR INFORMATION

Key Details of the Procept Class Action Lawsuit (2026)

Procept Class Action Lawsuit: A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation (NASDAQ: PRCT) and its executives for allegedly making false and misleading statements about the company’s financial health, sales performance, and field inventory.

 

Procept Class Action Lawsuit Overview

  • Affected Investors: Anyone who purchased or acquired PROCEPT securities between February 28, 2024, and February 25, 2026.
  • Lead Plaintiff Deadline: Investors who suffered significant losses have until September 22, 2026, to request court appointment as the lead plaintiff.
  • Current Stock Impact: The stock fell over 18% in two days following a key February 2026 disclosure and continued to decline to under $18 per share by late July 2026.

 

Core Allegations in the Procept Class Action Lawsuit

  • Undisclosed Bulk Discounting: The company allegedly operated a longstanding, hidden discount program.
  • Artificial Revenue Inflation: This program incentivized customers to buy in bulk at the end of quarters.
  • “Pulling Forward” Sales: This practice unsustainably inflated U.S. handpiece unit sales by pulling future revenue into earlier quarters.
  • Severe Inventory Glut: Handpiece sales significantly outpaced actual surgical procedures, building a hidden stockpile of over 10,000 excess units in the field.
  • Misleading Guidance: Management issued 2025 financial targets that lacked a reasonably achievable factual basis

 

Timeline of Disclosures

  • August & November 2025: The company missed its handpiece unit sales expectations and lowered projections, blaming “field inventory optimization”.
  • February 25, 2026: PROCEPT finally released three years of field procedure data. This exposed the 10,000+ unit customer overstocking problem and forced the company to eliminate the bulk discount program. Stock prices immediately plummeted from $27.84 to $22.69.

 

If you purchased or otherwise acquired Procept shares during this time and suffered financial losses, please contact attorney Timothy L. Miles of the Law Offices of Timothy L. Miles, at no cost, by calling 855/846-6529 or via e-mail at [email protected]. (24/7/365).

Timothy L. Miles

 

⚖ Securities Class Action
What Is the Class Period?
In a securities class action, the class period refers to the specific time frame during which the alleged fraudulent activity occurred — the period in which plaintiffs claim to have suffered financial losses due to misrepresentations or omissions made by the defendants.

Inclusion in Class Period
The class period is crucial in determining who can be included in the class and seek damages.
Start of Class Period
Typically starts when the alleged fraud was first publicly disclosed or when investors should have reasonably become aware of it.
End of Class Period
Usually ends when the alleged fraud was revealed to the public or when the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit.
Length of Class Period
The length can vary depending on the specific circumstances of each case — from weeks to several years.


How to Get Involved in the Procept Class Action Lawsuit

  • If you bought a security during the alleged class period and suffered a loss, you are generally automatically included in the class in the Procept Class Action Lawsuit. You don’t have to take any action unless you want to file a claim for recovery later. 
  • You may be notified of a class action by mail if you are an eligible class member in the Procept Class Action Lawsuit. 
⚖ Securities Class Action
What Plaintiffs Must Prove

Material Misstatement or Omission
The company made a false or misleading statement, or failed to disclose a material fact that investors would consider important in making investment decisions.
Scienter
The defendant acted with an intent to deceive, manipulate, or defraud — one of the most critical and demanding elements to establish in any securities fraud case.
Reliance
The plaintiff relied on the misstatement when buying or selling the security. For publicly traded securities this can be proven through the "fraud-on-the-market" theory — which presumes the market price reflects all public, material information.
Economic Loss
The plaintiff suffered an actual financial loss as a direct result of the defendant's fraudulent conduct — quantified through expert analysis and market data.
Loss Causation
The company's misstatement or omission directly caused the plaintiff's loss — often demonstrated by a stock price drop after the truth is revealed in a "corrective disclosure." This is the critical link between the fraud and the investor's financial harm.



What Is a Notice in a Class Action

  • A notice in a class action refers to the formal communication sent to potential class members informing them about the lawsuit and their rights to participate in it.
  • This notice is a crucial part of the class action process as it ensures that all individuals who may be affected by the outcome of the Procept class action lawsuit are aware of their rights and can choose whether to opt-in or opt-out of the class.
  • The notice typically contains information about the nature of the Procept Class Action Lawsuit, the claims being made, and the potential benefits or risks associated with participation. It also provides instructions on how to file a claim or request exclusion from the class.
  • Overall, the notice serves to promote transparency and fairness in the class action process by ensuring that all affected individuals have an opportunity to exercise their legal rights.
Law Offices of Timothy L. Miles

Lead Plaintiff Information


Allegations in the Procept Class Action Lawsuit

Procept is a medical technology company that sells surgical devices used in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

The Procept class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made materially false and/or misleading statements because they failed to disclose the following adverse facts pertaining to Procept’s business, operations, and financial condition, which were known to defendants or recklessly disregarded by them as follows:

  • That, during the Class Period, Procept had utilized an extensive discount program designed to incentivize its customers to place bulk orders in excess of procedure demand;
  • That Procept’s undisclosed discount program had artificially and unsustainably inflated Procept’s reported U.S. handpiece unit sales and revenues by pulling forward sales at the expense of future periods; 
  • That Procept’s undisclosed discount program had caused customer handpiece orders to materially exceed underlying procedure demand throughout the Class Period and that this differential had materially grown over time;
  • That Procept’s consistent surplus of U.S. handpiece unit sales relative to performed procedures had created a glut of field inventory and overstocking amongst Procept’s customer base, amounting to more than 10,000 excess units by the end of the Class Period;
  • That, as a result of (i)-(iv) above, defendants’ representations during the Class Period regarding Procept’s handpiece unit sales and the utilization of Procept’s field Systems were materially overstated;
  • That, as a result of (i)-(v) above, Procept was acutely exposed to material undisclosed risks of significant operational and financial harm; and (vii) that, as a result of (i)-(vi) above, Procept was unable to achieve its stated 2025 handpiece sales and revenue guidance and such guidance lacked a reasonably achievable factual basis.

The Procept class action lawsuit further alleges that on August 6, 2025, Procept announced earnings for its second fiscal quarter of 2025, revealing that Procept had only sold approximately 12,750 handpieces in the United States during the quarter.  During Procept’s earnings call, defendant Kevin Waters reported that Procept expected to ship approximately 13,350 units in the following quarter, significantly below consensus estimates of more than 13,840 units. 

Procept’s quarterly handpiece sales guidance also implied that Procept would need to grow handpiece sales by approximately 25% year-over-year in the fourth quarter in order to meet Procept’s annual unit sales guidance.  In addition, defendant Reza Zadno revealed that Procept was eliminating the role of Chief Commercial Officer in order to “strengthen” Procept’s “commercial execution.”  On this news, the price of Procept stock fell approximately 16% over a two-day trading period.

Then, on November 4, 2025, Procept announced earnings results for its third fiscal quarter of 2025, revealing that Procept had only sold 13,225 handpieces during the quarter, which missed Procept’s sales guidance issued during the prior quarter.  During the corresponding conference call, defendant Kevin Waters further revealed that Procept was reducing its annual handpiece sales guidance by 1,000 units, down from 53,000 units to 52,000 units to allow for the “optimization of field inventory.”  Defendant Larry L. Wood further admitted that Procept had not “been managing customer inventory by establishing par levels” and that some customers were “probably carrying too much inventory.” 

On this news, the price of Procept stock fell more than 10% over a two-day trading period.

Finally, on February 25, 2026, Procept announced earnings results for its fourth fiscal quarter and year ending December 31, 2025.  Procept revealed that handpiece sales had materially exceeded procedures in every quarter since the first fiscal quarter of 2023, a differential which had consistently grown over time, ultimately resulting in cumulative excess field inventory of more than 10,000 units.  Procept further revealed that quarterly handpiece unit sales in the United States had declined significantly from 13,225 units in the third quarter to 9,400 units, representing a sequential decline of nearly 30%. 

On this news, the price of Procept stock fell more than 18% over a two-day trading period.

⚖ Securities Class Action
Options That Shareholders Have

Do Nothing — Remain a Class Member
If you take no action, you automatically remain a member of the class so long as you purchased during the class period and suffered a loss.
Exclude Yourself — Opt Out
Upon receiving a court notice, you have the right to opt out by submitting a written request to the court clearly stating you wish to be excluded from the class action.
Submitting Your Request
Your request should include all identifying information — name, address, shares sold, etc. — and be postmarked by the deadline contained in the Notice.
Consequences of Opting Out
If you suffered significant losses you may file your own individual lawsuit. However, if there is a settlement in the class action, you will not be able to participate or share in any proceeds.



Rights of Investors in the Procept Class Action Lawsuit

Investors affected by the Procept class action lawsuit possess specific rights that they can exercise. Understanding these rights is vital for anyone considering involvement in the Procept class action lawsuit. 

Right to Information

  • This includes information on the case’s progress, potential settlements, and any necessary actions they may need to undertake. 

 

Right to Participate

  • Affected investors have the right to join the Procept class action lawsuit.
  • This allows them to collaborate with other investors in seeking compensation for their losses without the burden of filing individual lawsuits.

 

Right to Legal Representation

  • Investors can seek legal counsel to navigate the complexities of the Procept class action lawsuit.
  • Legal professionals can provide guidance and support throughout the process.
  • If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Procept class action lawsuit or just have general questions about you rights as a shareholder, please contact attorney Timothy L. Miles of the Law Offices of Timothy L. Miles, at no cost, by calling 855/846-6529 or via e-mail at [email protected].
Law Offices of Timothy L. Miles

What Is a Shareholder Derivative Action?


Contingency Fee Agreements: No Cost to Hire a Lawyer

  • No Fee:  It does not cost anything to hire a lawyer if you are eligible for an Procept class action lawsuit. We take all cases on a contingency basis which means we do not get paid unless we win or settle your case. 
  • Talk with a Lawyer Free of Charge: A lawyer can explain the process of an Procept class action lawsuit and answer any questions you may have free of charge.
⚠ Securities Fraud
Advanced Red Flags & Warning Signs

Aggressive Accounting
Watch for aggressive accounting practices such as recognizing revenue prematurely or delaying expense recognition — tactics that artificially inflate earnings and create a misleading picture of financial health. Scrutinize non-recurring or one-time items, which companies may use to smooth earnings and hide underlying problems.
Domineering Management
A major red flag is management that discourages questions or dissent from board members — a culture of intimidation that suppresses oversight, enables fraud, and prevents the board from fulfilling its fiduciary duty to shareholders.
Lack of Board Independence
Warning signs include a lack of independent directors or audit committee members with insufficient financial expertise — leaving shareholders without the independent oversight needed to detect and prevent fraudulent financial reporting.
Rotating Executives & Poor Communication
Frequent changes in key personnel — particularly in financial reporting roles — combined with poor communication between management and the board of directors are serious warning signs of potential fraud or financial misconduct.


Contact Timothy L. Miles Today About a Procept Class Action Lawsuit

The most important thing you need to know is you can call me at no charge if you wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Procept class action lawsuit, or just have general questions about you rights as a shareholder, please contact attorney Timothy L. Miles of the Law Offices of Timothy L. Miles, at no cost, by calling 855/846-6529 or via e-mail at [email protected]. (24/7/365).

Timothy L. Miles, Esq.
Law Offices of Timothy L. Miles
Tapestry at Brentwood Town Center
300 Centerview Dr. #247
Mailbox #1091
Brentwood,TN 37027
Phone: (855) Tim-MLaw (855-846-6529)
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.classactionlawyertn.com

Facebook    Linkedin    Pinterest    youtube

 

Timothy L. Miles, Esq.
BPR Number: 021605
Status: Active
Licensed in TN Since: 2001
Public Discipline: None
Timothy L. Miles | Free Case Evaluation
Take Action: Call Today
"It will be the only call you need to make."
SUBMIT YOUR INFORMATION
Timothy L. Miles

Timothy L. Miles is a nationally known and top rated class action lawyer who has been leading the fight to protect shareholder and consumer rights for over 20 years. Mr. Miles received a Bachelor of Science in Psychology from Belmont University in Nashville, Tennessee in 1995 and his J.D. from the Nashville School of Law in May 2001, graduating third in his class, and was made a member of the Honorable Society of Cooper's Inn which is reserved for students graduating in the top ten percent of their class.