Introduction to the Procept Class Action Lawsuit

  • Captioned Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund v. PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation, No. 26-cv-07691 (N.D. Cal.), the Procept class action lawsuit charges Procept and certain of Procept’s top current and former executive officers with violations of the Securities Act of 1933.

The most important thing you need to know is you can call me at no charge if you wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Procept class action lawsuit, or just have general questions about you rights as a shareholder, please contact attorney Timothy L. Miles of the Law Offices of Timothy L. Miles, at no cost, by calling (855) 846-6529 or via e-mail at [email protected].(24/7/365).

Call Tim Miles free case evaluation in Procept class action lawsuit

Key Details of the Procept Class Action Lawsuit (2026)

Procept Class Action Lawsuit: A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation (NASDAQ: PRCT) and its executives for allegedly making false and misleading statements about the company’s financial health, sales performance, and field inventory.

Procept Class Action Lawsuit Overview

  • Affected Investors: Anyone who purchased or acquired PROCEPT securities between February 28, 2024, and February 25, 2026.
  • Lead Plaintiff Deadline: Investors who suffered significant losses have until September 22, 2026, to request court appointment as the lead plaintiff.
  • Current Stock Impact: The stock fell over 18% in two days following a key February 2026 disclosure and continued to decline to under $18 per share by late July 2026.

Core Allegations in the Procept Class Action Lawsuit

  • Undisclosed Bulk Discounting: The company allegedly operated a longstanding, hidden discount program.
  • Artificial Revenue Inflation: This program incentivized customers to buy in bulk at the end of quarters.
  • “Pulling Forward” Sales: This practice unsustainably inflated U.S. handpiece unit sales by pulling future revenue into earlier quarters.
  • Severe Inventory Glut: Handpiece sales significantly outpaced actual surgical procedures, building a hidden stockpile of over 10,000 excess units in the field.
  • Misleading Guidance: Management issued 2025 financial targets that lacked a reasonably achievable factual basis

Timeline of Disclosures

  • August & November 2025: The company missed its handpiece unit sales expectations and lowered projections, blaming “field inventory optimization”.
  • February 25, 2026: PROCEPT finally released three years of field procedure data. This exposed the 10,000+ unit customer overstocking problem and forced the company to eliminate the bulk discount program. Stock prices immediately plummeted from $27.84 to $22.69.

If you purchased or otherwise acquired Procept shares during this time and suffered financial losses, please contact attorney Timothy L. Miles of the Law Offices of Timothy L. Miles, at no cost, by calling (855) 846-6529 or via e-mail at [email protected]. (24/7/365).

3d rendering of technical financial graph on stock exchange display panel in Procept class action lawsuit

How to Get Involved in the Procept Class Action Lawsuit

  • If you bought a security during the alleged class period and suffered a loss, you are generally automatically included in the class in the Procept Class Action Lawsuit. You don’t have to take any action unless you want to file a claim for recovery later.

What Is a Notice in a Class Action

Allegations in the Procept Class Action Lawsuit

Procept is a medical technology company that sells surgical devices used in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

The Procept class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made materially false and/or misleading statements because they failed to disclose the following adverse facts pertaining to Procept’s business, operations, and financial condition, incorporated into their financial statements, which were known to defendants or recklessly disregarded by them as follows:

  • That, during the Class Period, Procept had utilized an extensive discount program designed to incentivize its customers to place bulk orders in excess of procedure demand;
  • That Procept’s undisclosed discount program had artificially and unsustainably inflated Procept’s reported U.S. handpiece unit sales and revenues by pulling forward sales at the expense of future periods;
  • That Procept’s undisclosed discount program had caused customer handpiece orders to materially exceed underlying procedure demand throughout the Class Period and that this differential had materially grown over time;
  • That Procept’s consistent surplus of U.S. handpiece unit sales relative to performed procedures had created a glut of field inventory and overstocking amongst Procept’s customer base, amounting to more than 10,000 excess units by the end of the Class Period;
  • That, as a result of (i)-(iv) above, defendants’ representations during the Class Period regarding Procept’s handpiece unit sales and the utilization of Procept’s field Systems were materially overstated;
  • That, as a result of (i)-(v) above, Procept was acutely exposed to material undisclosed risks of significant operational and financial harm; and (vii) that, as a result of (i)-(vi) above, Procept was unable to achieve its stated 2025 handpiece sales and revenue guidance and such guidance lacked a reasonably achievable factual basis.

The Procept class action lawsuit further alleges that on August 6, 2025, Procept announced earnings for its second fiscal quarter of 2025, revealing that Procept had only sold approximately 12,750 handpieces in the United States during the quarter.  During Procept’s earnings call, defendant Kevin Waters reported that Procept expected to ship approximately 13,350 units in the following quarter, significantly below consensus estimates of more than 13,840 units.

Procept’s quarterly handpiece sales guidance also implied that Procept would need to grow handpiece sales by approximately 25% year-over-year in the fourth quarter in order to meet Procept’s annual unit sales guidance.  In addition, defendant Reza Zadno revealed that Procept was eliminating the role of Chief Commercial Officer in order to “strengthen” Procept’s “commercial execution.”  On this news, the price of Procept stock fell approximately 16% over a two-day trading period.

Then, on November 4, 2025, Procept announced earnings results for its third fiscal quarter of 2025, revealing that Procept had only sold 13,225 handpieces during the quarter, which missed Procept’s sales guidance issued during the prior quarter.  During the corresponding conference call, defendant Kevin Waters further revealed that Procept was reducing its annual handpiece sales guidance by 1,000 units, down from 53,000 units to 52,000 units to allow for the “optimization of field inventory.”  Defendant Larry L. Wood further admitted that Procept had not “been managing customer inventory by establishing par levels” and that some customers were “probably carrying too much inventory.” 

On this news, the price of Procept stock fell more than 10% over a two-day trading period.

Finally, on February 25, 2026, Procept announced earnings results for its fourth fiscal quarter and year ending December 31, 2025.  Procept revealed that handpiece sales had materially exceeded procedures in every quarter since the first fiscal quarter of 2023, a differential which had consistently grown over time, ultimately resulting in cumulative excess field inventory of more than 10,000 units.  Procept further revealed that quarterly handpiece unit sales in the United States had declined significantly from 13,225 units in the third quarter to 9,400 units, representing a sequential decline of nearly 30%.

On this news, the price of Procept stock fell more than 18% over a two-day trading period.

Blue three D stock schart with line graph used in Procept class action lawsuit

Rights of Investors in the Procept Class Action Lawsuit

Investors affected by the Procept class action lawsuit possess specific rights that they can exercise. Understanding these rights is vital for anyone considering involvement in the Procept class action lawsuit.

Right to Information

  • This includes information on the case’s progress, potential settlements, and any necessary actions they may need to undertake.  

Right to Participate

  • Affected investors have the right to join the Procept class action lawsuit.

Right to Legal Representation

  • Investors can seek legal counsel to navigate the complexities of the Procept class action lawsuit.
  • If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Procept class action lawsuit or just have general questions about you rights as a shareholder, please contact attorney Timothy L. Miles of the Law Offices of Timothy L. Miles, at no cost, by calling 855/846-6529 or via e-mail at [email protected].

Contingency Fee Agreements: No Cost to Hire a Lawyer

Call Tim Miles free case evaluation in Procept class action lawsuit

Contact Timothy L. Miles Today About a Procept Class Action Lawsuit

The most important thing you need to know is you can call me at no charge if you wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Procept class action lawsuit, or just have general questions about you rights as a shareholder, please contact attorney Timothy L. Miles of the Law Offices of Timothy L. Miles, at no cost, by calling 855/846-6529 or via e-mail at [email protected]. (24/7/365).

Timothy L. Miles, Esq.
Law Offices of Timothy L. Miles
Tapestry at Brentwood Town Center
300 Centerview Dr. #247
Mailbox #1091
Brentwood,TN 37027
Phone: (855) Tim-MLaw (855-846-6529)
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.classactionlawyertn.com

Facebook    Linkedin    Pinterest    youtube