Savara Class Action Lawsuit: 8 Frequently Asked Questions

Lead plaintiff motions for the Savara class action lawsuit must be filed with the court no later than December 8, 2025. When a securities class action is filed:

• The person who files the first complaint is required to publish a notice announcing the filing.

• Anyone who wants to be the lead plaintiff on behalf of the class must thereafter file a motion to be appointed as lead plaintiff(s) no later than 60 days after the notice was published.

What are the The Benefits of Serving as a Lead Plaintiff in the Savara Class Action Lawsuit?

• Influencing litigation strategy: As a lead plaintiff, you have a direct voice in key strategic decisions, including the decision to settle or proceed to trial.

• Negotiating more competitive fees: Your involvement provides an opportunity to negotiate more competitive attorney fees and reduce litigation costs, which can maximize the net recovery for the entire class

• Active participation in the case: You will be able to review important court filings, monitor the progress of the case, and discuss litigation strategies with legal counsel.

• Leading settlement discussions: Lead plaintiffs participate in mediation and settlement discussions and must approve any settlement before it is presented to the court.

• No financial risk: In most cases, no financial risk, as lead counsel covers all costs and expenses. They work on a contingency basis are only paid if they secure a settlement or judgment, and reimbursement for expenses comes from the settlement fund, not your personal assets.

What Are the Responsibilities the Lead Plaintiff Will Have i the Savara Class Action Lawsuit?

• Overseeing lead counsel: You will select, monitor, and oversee the law firm representing the class.

• Reviewing legal documents: You will review and provide feedback on important court filings before they are submitted.

• Discussing strategy: You will work directly with lead counsel to discuss litigation strategies and key decisions.

• Potential participation in legal events: This may include attending depositions and hearings, if necessary.

• Input on settlement decisions: Your input will be crucial for any decision concerning the settlement of the securities class action.’

What Are the Eligibility Criteria for Lead Plaintiff Appointment in the Savara Class Action Lawsuit

To be eligible for appointment as the lead plaintiff in the Savara class action lawsuit, an investor must meet the following criteria:

• Securities Acquisition: The investor must have purchased or acquired Savara Inc. (NASDAQ: SVRA) securities between March 7, 2024 and May 23, 2025.

• Financial Losses: The investor must have suffered financial losses as a direct result of the alleged securities fraud perpetrated by Savara and its executives.

• Typicality and Adequacy: The investor’s legal claims must be typical of those asserted on behalf of the class, and they must demonstrate their ability to adequately represent the interests of the entire class through experience, resources, and the absence of conflicts of interest.

It is crucial to note that both domestic and international investors who meet these criteria are eligible to seek appointment as the lead plaintiff in the class action lawsuit, as courts have consistently recognized the rights of non-U.S. investors in securities class actions.

What Are the Legal Requirements for Prevailing in the Savara Class Action Lawsuit?

• A false statement or concealment. This element requires the defendant to have made a public statement that was either an “untrue statement of a material fact” or to have failed to disclose a material fact necessary to make the statements not misleading.

• Materiality. A fact is “material” if a reasonable investor would have considered it important when deciding whether to buy or sell a security. This is an objective standard, not based on what a specific individual investor might consider important.

• Culpable state of mind. Scienter is a Latin term referring to a mental state involving intent or knowledge of wrongdoing.

• Intent to deceive. To meet this requirement, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant acted with an “intent to deceive, manipulate, or defraud”.

• Recklessness. While negligence is not enough, acting with a severely reckless disregard for the truth can also satisfy the scienter requirement.

• In connection with the purchase or sale. The fraudulent conduct must have occurred in connection with the purchase or sale of a security. This means the deception was part of a securities transaction.

• Justifiable dependence on the statement. The plaintiff must show that they relied on the misrepresentation or omission when making their investment decision. Reliance is sometimes called “transaction causation” because it establishes the causal link between the deception and the investor’s decision to enter the transaction.

• “Fraud-on-the-market” theory. For public securities traded on an efficient market, plaintiffs may be able to invoke a legal presumption that they relied on the integrity of the market price, which presumably incorporated the material misstatement. The defendant can attempt to rebut this presumption.

• Tangible financial harm. The plaintiff must demonstrate that they suffered a measurable financial loss. It is not enough to simply show that a misrepresentation was made.

• Out-of-pocket damages. A common measure of loss is the difference between the price the plaintiff paid for the security and its value at the time of purchase, had the truth been known.

• The “what if” scenario. This element establishes the causal link between the fraudulent misstatement or omission and the plaintiff’s economic loss. The Supreme Court case Dura Pharmaceuticals v. Broudo made it clear that a plaintiff cannot simply allege that they paid an artificially inflated price.

• Corrective disclosure. To prove loss causation, a plaintiff often must show that the stock price dropped after the truth became known, thereby linking the fraud to the investor’s actual economic harm. The plaintiff must isolate the portion of the loss attributable to the fraud versus other factors, such as general market downturns or other unrelated business problems.

What Are the Steps in the Savara Class Action Lawsuit?