Microstrategy Class Action Lawsuit: The Ultimate Authoritative Investor Playbook to the Lead Plaintiff Process [2025]

The MicroStrategy lawsuit centers on allegations of misleading investors through the provision of inaccurate or incomplete information regarding the company’s financial status and operations. Such allegations, if proven true, could result in significant legal and financial consequences for MicroStrategy. You need to grasp the magnitude of these claims and their potential impact on the company’s future.

Understanding the lawsuit requires analyzing the details of the allegations. Investors claim that MicroStrategy’s disclosures were not as transparent as they should have been, leading to financial losses once the truth was revealed. Legal experts are examining whether there was a deliberate attempt to mislead stakeholders, which could lead to punitive measures.

For anyone involved in investing, the MicroStrategy class action lawsuit serves as a stark reminder of the importance of due diligence and the risks associated with corporate investments. As you navigate through the nuances of this case, consider how transparency and accountability play pivotal roles in maintaining investor trust and confidence in the market.

Allegations in the MicroStrategy Class Action Lawsuit

Since 2020, MicroStrategy has increasingly focused on purchasing and holding bitcoin, a type of crypto-currency, as a long-term business strategy.  According to the complaint, on January 1, 2025, MicroStrategy adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Update No. 2023-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Crypto Assets (Subtopic 350-60): Accounting for and Disclosure of Crypto Assets (“ASU 2023-08”), which requires publicly traded companies to measure their crypto assets at fair value in their financial statements, with gains and losses from changes in the fair value of those assets recognized in net income in each reporting period.

The MicroStrategy class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:

1. The anticipated profitability of MicroStrategy’s bitcoin-focused investment strategy and treasury operations was overstated; and
2. The various risks associated with bitcoin’s volatility and the magnitude of losses MicroStrategy could recognize on the value of its digital assets following its adoption of ASU 2023-08 were understated.

The MicroStrategy class action lawsuit further alleges that on April 7, 2025, MicroStrategy disclosed that, following its adoption of ASU 2023-08, it recognized a $5.91 billion unrealized loss on its digital assets for the first quarter of 2025, which was expected to result in a net loss for the quarter.

As a result, MicroStrategy warned investors that “[w]e may not be able to regain profitability in future periods, particularly if we incur significant unrealized losses related to our digital assets,” according to the MicroStrategy lawsuit.

The MicroStrategy class action lawsuit alleges that on this news, the price of MicroStrategy stock fell nearly 9%.

The Lead Plaintiff Process in the Elevance Health Class Action Lawsuit

The Lead Plaintiff Process under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA) is a critical mechanism designed to ensure that the most capable parties represent the interests of the class in securities class action lawsuits. This process begins when a securities class action lawsuit is filed, and a notice is published informing potential class members of the pending litigation.

Potential lead plaintiffs then have 60 days from the date of the notice to file a motion with the court indicating their desire to serve as lead plaintiff. The court is tasked with selecting the lead plaintiff, typically giving preference to the individual or institutional investor with the largest financial interest in the case, as they are presumed to be the most motivated to prosecute the action vigorously.

The MicroStrategy class action lawsuit serves as a pertinent example of the PSLRA’s lead plaintiff process in action. In such lawsuits, shareholders who believe they have been wronged by corporate misconduct can band together to seek redress.

By appointing a lead plaintiff, the court ensures that the class’s interests are adequately represented and that the legal strategy pursued is in the best interest of all class members. The lead plaintiff plays a central role in decision-making throughout the litigation, including selecting counsel and guiding settlement discussions.

The PSLRA’s lead plaintiff provisions were implemented to curb abuses in securities litigation, such as “lawyer-driven” lawsuits where attorneys, rather than clients, controlled the litigation. By empowering shareholders and other investors to take the reins, the PSLRA aims to enhance accountability and improve outcomes for defrauded investors.

The MicroStrategy class action lawsuit illustrates how these provisions work in practice, ensuring that those with significant stakes in the outcome can effectively advocate on behalf of all affected parties.

Lead plaintiff motions for the MicroStrategy class action lawsuit must be filed with the court no later than July 15, 2025. When a securities class action is filed:

1. The person who files the first complaint is required to publish a notice announcing the filing.
2. Anyone who wants to be the lead plaintiff on behalf of the class must thereafter file a motion to be appointed as lead plaintiff(s) no later than 60 days after the notice was published.

Lead Plaintiff Deadlines

The Benefits of Serving as a Lead Plaintiff in the MicroStrategy Lawsuit

1. Negotiating more competitive attorney fees and reducing litigation costs.
2. Managing the litigation by overseeing the progress of the case and reviewing important filings.
3. Participating in mediation and settlement discussions.
4. Having a voice in decision-making processes regarding the settlement.
5. No financial risk, as lead counsel covers all costs and expenses and are paid only if they secure a settlement or judgment recovery for the class
6. Potentially enjoying long-term benefits from governance reform resulting from the litigation.

The Responsibilities the Lead Plaintiff Will Have in the MicroStrategy Lawsuit

1. Selecting, monitoring, and overseeing Lead Counsel.​
2. Reviewing and commenting on court filings on behalf of the class.
3. Discussing litigation strategies with the Lead Counsel.
4. Attending depositions (if necessary) and giving a deposition.
5. Attending hearings (if necessary).
6. Participating in mediation and the trial (if necessary).
7. Provide input on any decision concerning the settlement of the securities class action.

The Eligibility Criteria for Lead Plaintiff Appointment in the MicroStrategy Class Action Lawsuit

To be eligible for appointment as the lead plaintiff in the MicroStrategy class action lawsuit, an investor must meet the following criteria:

1. Securities Acquisition: The investor must have purchased or acquired MicroStrategy Incorporated d/b/a Strategy (NASDAQ: MSTR; STRK; STRF) securities between April 30, 2024 and April 4, 2025.
2. Financial Losses: The investor must have suffered financial losses as a direct result of the alleged securities fraud perpetrated by MicroStrategy and its executives.
3. Typicality and Adequacy: The investor’s legal claims must be typical of those asserted on behalf of the class, and they must demonstrate their ability to adequately represent the interests of the entire class through experience, resources, and the absence of conflicts of interest.

It is crucial to note that both domestic and international investors who meet these criteria are eligible to seek appointment as the lead plaintiff in the class action lawsuit, as courts have consistently recognized the rights of non-U.S. investors in securities class actions.

The Legal Requirements for Prevailing in the MicroStrategy Lawsuit

1. Material Misrepresentation or Omission
2. Scienter
3. Connection to Securities Transaction
4. Reliance
5. Economic Loss
6. Loss Causation

Steps for Investors to Take to Protect their Interests

Gathering and Organizing Relevant Evidence

In a securities class action lawsuit just like the MicroStrategy class action lawsuit, evidence is the cornerstone of building a compelling case. For shareholders, gathering and organizing relevant evidence is a critical step in substantiating claims of corporate misconduct.

The evidence typically revolves around documents and communications that demonstrate the company’s misrepresentations or omissions, as well as the financial harm suffered by shareholders. Below are some steps you should take:

• Compile all financial statements, press releases, analyst reports, emails, and any internal documents that shed light on the alleged wrongdoing alleged in the MicroStrategy class action lawsuit.
• Meticulously document your investment history with the MicroStrategy, including dates of stock purchases and sales, quantities, and prices. This information is crucial for calculating damages and proving that the shareholder suffered financial losses as a result of the company’s actions.
• Maintaining detailed records not only strengthens the individual’s position in the lawsuit but also contributes to the overall strength of the MicroStrategy lawsuit, by providing a clear picture of the impact on shareholders.
• Organizing this evidence in a systematic manner is equally important. Shareholders can create a comprehensive file of all relevant documents, categorized by type and date, to facilitate easy retrieval and review by legal counsel.

This preparation not only aids in the efficient prosecution of the MicroStrategy lawsuit, but also demonstrates the shareholder’s commitment and readiness to actively participate in the litigation process.

By thoroughly gathering and organizing evidence, shareholders lay a solid foundation for holding corporations accountable and seeking redress for their financial injuries.

Staying Informed: Monitoring Case Developments

In the fast-paced environment of securities class action lawsuits, staying informed about case developments is crucial for shareholders. As the MicroStrategy class action lawsuit, moves forward, new information and events can significantly impact the strategy and potential outcomes.

MicroStrategy shareholders must actively monitor key milestones, such as court rulings, settlement negotiations, and any changes in the legal landscape. Keeping abreast of these developments ensures that shareholders are well-positioned to make timely and informed decisions.

Effective communication with legal counsel is essential for staying updated on case developments. Attorneys provide regular updates and analyses of the ongoing proceedings, helping shareholders understand the implications of each development. This information is vital for assessing the potential risks and benefits of different courses of action, such as whether to accept a settlement offer or continue pursuing the Vestis lawsuit.

By maintaining open lines of communication with their legal team, shareholders can remain engaged and proactive throughout the litigation process.

Shareholders can also benefit from following news sources and industry reports related to the MicroStrategy class action lawsuit and the defendant company. These sources can provide valuable insights into broader market trends, regulatory changes, and public perceptions that may influence the case.

By staying informed, shareholders can better anticipate shifts in the legal and financial landscape, enabling them to adapt their strategies and protect their interests effectively.

In securities class actions, knowledge is power, and staying informed is a key component of successful participation.

Frequently Asked Questions About the MicroStrategy Lawsuit

What initiated the MicroStrategy class action lawsuit?

The lawsuit was initiated by investors alleging that MicroStrategy provided misleading information regarding its financial health and operations, resulting in financial losses.

How can I join the MicroStrategy class action lawsuit?

If you purchased shares during the class period and suffered a loss, then you are automatically a member of the class and do not need to do anything at this point unless you are considering moving for lead plaintiff.

What are the potential benefits of a class action lawsuit?

Class action lawsuits allow individual investors to collectively seek justice and compensation, which might be challenging to pursue individually. They also promote corporate accountability.

How long will the lawsuit take to resolve?

The duration of class action lawsuits can vary significantly, depending on the complexity of the case, legal strategies, and whether settlements are reached. It could take several months to years.

Contact Timothy L. Miles Today About a MicroStrategy Class Action Lawsuit

If you suffered losses in MicroStrategy stock, call us today for a free case evaluation about a MicroStrategy class action lawsuit. 855-846-6529 or [email protected] (24/7/365).

Timothy L. Miles, Esq.
Law Offices of Timothy L. Miles
Tapestry at Brentwood Town Center
300 Centerview Dr. #247
Mailbox #1091
Brentwood,TN 37027
Phone: (855) Tim-MLaw (855-846-6529)
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.classactionlawyertn.com

Facebook    Linkedin    Pinterest    youtube