Introduction to the MicroStrategy Class Action Lawsuit
The MicroStrategy class action lawsuit seeks to represent purchasers or acquirers of MicroStrategy Incorporated d/b/a Strategy (NASDAQ: MSTR; STRK; STRF) securities between April 30, 2024 and April 4, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”). Captioned Hamza v. MicroStrategy Incorporated d/b/a Strategy, No. 25-cv-00861 (E.D. Va.), the MicroStrategy class action lawsuit charges MicroStrategy and certain of MicroStrategy’s top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the MicroStrategy class action lawsuit or just have general questions about you rights as a shareholder, please contact attorney Timothy L. Miles of the Law Offices of Timothy L. Miles, at no cost, by calling 855/846-6529 or via e-mail at [email protected]. Lead plaintiff motions for the MicroStrategy lawsuit must be filed with the court no later than July 15, 2025.
Strategy Company Profile
Strategy (Nasdaq: MSTR) is the premier Bitcoin Treasury Company and the largest independent business intelligence firm globally. The company’s cutting-edge, cloud-native, AI-powered analytics software serves thousands of clients worldwide, showcasing over 35 years of software expertise.
According to the company, they are at the forefront of innovation, exploring new applications for Bitcoin that promise significant value creation. Our unique operating structure and strategic focus on technology empower us to deliver unparalleled opportunities in the digital asset space.
In February 2025, Strategy rebranded from MicroStrategy to Strategy, reflecting our commitment to innovation and leadership in the evolving landscape of Bitcoin and enterprise analytics.
Industry
Software Development
Company size
1,001-5,000 employees
3,286 associated members
Headquarters
Tysons Corner, VA
Specialties
- Industry Leader in Business Intelligence,
- Enterprise Software Solutions,
- Cloud, Security,
- Analytics,
- Artificial Intelligence/AI, Generative AI,
- Generative BI, and BI
Understanding Securities Fraud Class Action Lawsuits
Securities fraud class action lawsuits represent a significant legal mechanism for investors who have suffered financial losses due to corporate malfeasance. These lawsuits, such as the MicroStrategy lawsuit, typically arise when a company or its executives engage in deceptive practices that mislead investors about the company’s financial health or prospect.
The goal of such litigation is to hold the perpetrators accountable and secure compensation for the affected investors. Securities fraud encompasses a range of activities, including insider trading, false financial statements, and misleading disclosures, all of which can severely impact market integrity and investor confidence.
In a class action context, a group of investors collectively brings the lawsuit against the defendant, which could be a corporation or its executives. This collective approach is particularly powerful in the securities realm because it allows individual investors, who might not have the resources to pursue litigation on their own, to band together and seek justice.
The class action mechanism ensures that the legal process is efficient and that the interests of all affected investors are represented.
The complexity of securities fraud class action lawsuits requires plaintiffs to navigate a labyrinth of legal standards and procedural hurdles. One of the most significant challenges is surviving a motion to dismiss, a legal maneuver by the defendants to have the case thrown out before it reaches trial.
Understanding the nuances of these lawsuits is crucial for any stakeholder involved, as it sets the stage for the strategic decisions that will follow. In the case of the MicroStrategy class action lawsuit, these elements come into sharp focus, highlighting the importance of a well-crafted legal strategy.
Overview of the MicroStrategy Class Action Lawsuit
The MicroStrategy class action lawsuit centers on allegations of misleading investors through the provision of inaccurate or incomplete information regarding the company’s financial status and operations. Such allegations, if proven true, could result in significant legal and financial consequences for MicroStrategy. You need to grasp the magnitude of these claims and their potential impact on the company’s future.
Understanding the MicroStrategy lawsuit requires analyzing the details of the allegations. Investors claim that MicroStrategy’s disclosures were not as transparent as they should have been, leading to financial losses once the truth was revealed. Legal experts are examining whether there was a deliberate attempt to mislead stakeholders, which could lead to punitive measures.
For anyone involved in investing, the MicroStrategy lawsuit serves as a stark reminder of the importance of due diligence and the risks associated with corporate investments. As you navigate through the nuances of this case, consider how transparency and accountability play pivotal roles in maintaining investor trust and confidence in the market.
Allegations in the MicroStrategy Class Action Lawsuit
Since 2020, MicroStrategy has increasingly focused on purchasing and holding bitcoin, a type of crypto-currency, as a long-term business strategy. According to the complaint, on January 1, 2025, MicroStrategy adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Update No. 2023-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Crypto Assets (Subtopic 350-60): Accounting for and Disclosure of Crypto Assets (“ASU 2023-08”), which requires publicly traded companies to measure their crypto assets at fair value in their financial statements, with gains and losses from changes in the fair value of those assets recognized in net income in each reporting period.
The MicroStrategy class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
- The anticipated profitability of MicroStrategy’s bitcoin-focused investment strategy and treasury operations was overstated; and
- The various risks associated with bitcoin’s volatility and the magnitude of losses MicroStrategy could recognize on the value of its digital assets following its adoption of ASU 2023-08 were understated.
The MicroStrategy class action lawsuit further alleges that on April 7, 2025, MicroStrategy disclosed that, following its adoption of ASU 2023-08, it recognized a $5.91 billion unrealized loss on its digital assets for the first quarter of 2025, which was expected to result in a net loss for the quarter.
As a result, MicroStrategy warned investors that “[w]e may not be able to regain profitability in future periods, particularly if we incur significant unrealized losses related to our digital assets,” according to the complaint.
The MicroStrategy class action lawsuit alleges that on this news, the price of MicroStrategy stock fell nearly 9%.
The Lead Plaintiff Process Under the PSLRA and Its Impact on the MicroStrategy Lawsuit
The Lead Plaintiff process under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) is a critical component of securities class action lawsuits, such as the MicroStrategy lawsuit. This process begins when a securities class action complaint is filed, alleging violations of federal securities laws. The PSLRA mandates that the court appoint a Lead Plaintiff to act on behalf of all class members. This role is pivotal because the Lead Plaintiff makes crucial decisions about the direction of the litigation, including selecting and retaining counsel.
To initiate the process, a notice of the lawsuit must be published within 20 days of filing, informing potential class members of their right to apply for Lead Plaintiff status. Interested parties typically file a motion with the court within 60 days of the notice date, stating their desire to serve as Lead Plaintiff.
The court evaluates these applications based on several criteria, including the financial interest of the applicants in the outcome of the case and their ability to represent the class effectively.
The PSLRA favors appointing institutional investors as Lead Plaintiffs because they often have significant financial stakes and the resources to oversee complex litigation. Once appointed, the Lead Plaintiff plays a strategic role in steering the lawsuit towards a favorable resolution, often through settlements or court judgments.
For instance, in high-profile cases like the MicroStrategy lawsuit, the decisions made by the Lead Plaintiff can significantly impact the recovery and relief obtained for all affected shareholders.
The Lead Plaintiff Deadline in the MicroStrategy Class Action Lawsuit
Lead plaintiff motions for the MicroStrategy class action lawsuit must be filed with the court no later than July 15, 2025. When a securities class action is filed:
- The person who files the first complaint is required to publish a notice announcing the filing.
- Anyone who wants to be the lead plaintiff on behalf of the class must thereafter file a motion to be appointed as lead plaintiff(s) no later than 60 days after the notice was published.
The Benefits of Serving as a Lead Plaintiff in the MicroStrategy Lawsuit
- Negotiating more competitive attorney fees and reducing litigation costs.
- Managing the litigation by overseeing the progress of the case and reviewing important filings.
- Participating in mediation and settlement discussions.
- Having a voice in decision-making processes regarding the settlement.
- No financial risk, as lead counsel covers all costs and expenses and are paid only if they secure a settlement or judgment recovery for the class
- Potentially enjoying long-term benefits from governance reform resulting from the litigation.
The Responsibilities the Lead Plaintiff Will Have in the MicroStrategy Lawsuit
- Selecting, monitoring, and overseeing Lead Counsel.
- Reviewing and commenting on court filings on behalf of the class.
- Discussing litigation strategies with the Lead Counsel.
- Attending depositions (if necessary) and giving a deposition.
- Attending hearings (if necessary).
- Participating in mediation and the trial (if necessary).
- Provide input on any decision concerning the settlement of the securities class action.
The Eligibility Criteria for Lead Plaintiff Appointment in the MicroStrategy Class Action Lawsuit
To be eligible for appointment as the lead plaintiff in the MicroStrategy class action lawsuit, an investor must meet the following criteria:
- Securities Acquisition: The investor must have purchased or acquired MicroStrategy Incorporated d/b/a Strategy (NASDAQ: MSTR; STRK; STRF) securities between April 30, 2024 and April 4, 2025, inclusive.
- Financial Losses: The investor must have suffered financial losses as a direct result of the alleged securities fraud perpetrated by MicroStrategy and its executives.
- Typicality and Adequacy: The investor’s legal claims must be typical of those asserted on behalf of the class, and they must demonstrate their ability to adequately represent the interests of the entire class through experience, resources, and the absence of conflicts of interest.
It is crucial to note that both domestic and international investors who meet these criteria are eligible to seek appointment as the lead plaintiff in the class action lawsuit, as courts have consistently recognized the rights of non-U.S. investors in securities class actions.
The Legal Requirements for Prevailing in the MicroStrategy Lawsuit
- Material Misrepresentation or Omission
- Scienter
- Connection to Securities Transaction
- Reliance
- Economic Loss
- Loss Causation
Opting-out of the MicroStrategy Class Action Lawsuit
Opting out of a class action lawsuit involves an individual choosing not to participate as a member of the class. In the context of the MicroStrategy class action lawsuit, this means that a shareholder or other affected party would decide to pursue their own separate legal action rather than be part of the collective lawsuit.
Opting out can be a strategic decision based on various factors such as the desire for greater control over the litigation process, potential for a larger individual settlement, or differing personal circumstances that may not align with the class’s claims.
When an individual opts out of a class action, they retain the right to file their own lawsuit against the defendant, in this case, Vestis. This decision must be made within a specified timeframe and in accordance with the procedures outlined by the court overseeing the class action.
It is essential for individuals considering this option to thoroughly evaluate their legal standing and consult with an attorney who can provide guidance tailored to their specific situation.
The MicroStrategy class action lawsuit, like many class actions, seeks to address grievances shared by a large group of plaintiffs who have been similarly affected by the company’s actions.
While participating in a class action can streamline the litigation process and reduce individual legal costs, opting out allows for a more customized approach to seeking justice and compensation.
This decision should be made carefully, weighing the potential benefits and drawbacks in light of one’s unique circumstances and goals. If you have substantial losses, you may want to consider opting-out, but remember if you do, you will not be able to participate in any settlement in the MicroStrategy lawsuit.
Tips for Investors to Take to Protect their Interest in the MicroStrategy Lawsuit
Gathering and Organizing Relevant Evidence
In a securities class action lawsuit just like the MicroStrategy class action lawsuit, evidence is the cornerstone of building a compelling case. For shareholders, gathering and organizing relevant evidence is a critical step in substantiating claims of corporate misconduct.
The evidence typically revolves around documents and communications that demonstrate the company’s misrepresentations or omissions, as well as the financial harm suffered by shareholders. Below are some steps you should take:
- Compile all financial statements, press releases, analyst reports, emails, and any internal documents that shed light on the alleged wrongdoing alleged in the MicroStrategy class action lawsuit.
- Meticulously document your investment history with the MicroStrategy, including dates of stock purchases and sales, quantities, and prices. This information is crucial for calculating damages and proving that the shareholder suffered financial losses as a result of the company’s actions.
- Maintaining detailed records not only strengthens the individual’s position in the lawsuit but also contributes to the overall strength of the MicroStrategy lawsuit, by providing a clear picture of the impact on shareholders.
- Organizing this evidence in a systematic manner is equally important. Shareholders can create a comprehensive file of all relevant documents, categorized by type and date, to facilitate easy retrieval and review by legal counsel.
This preparation not only aids in the efficient prosecution of the MicroStrategy lawsuit, but also demonstrates the shareholder’s commitment and readiness to actively participate in the litigation process.
By thoroughly gathering and organizing evidence, shareholders lay a solid foundation for holding corporations accountable and seeking redress for their financial injuries.
Staying Informed: Monitoring Case Developments
In the fast-paced environment of securities class action lawsuits, staying informed about case developments is crucial for shareholders. As the MicroStrategy class action lawsuit, moves forward, new information and events can significantly impact the strategy and potential outcomes. UroGen shareholders must actively monitor key milestones, such as court rulings, settlement negotiations, and any changes in the legal landscape.
Keeping abreast of these developments ensures that shareholders are well-positioned to make timely and informed decisions.
Effective communication with legal counsel is essential for staying updated on case developments. Attorneys provide regular updates and analyses of the ongoing proceedings, helping shareholders understand the implications of each development.
This information is vital for assessing the potential risks and benefits of different courses of action, such as whether to accept a settlement offer or continue pursuing the MicroStrategy class action lawsuit.
By maintaining open lines of communication with their legal team, shareholders can remain engaged and proactive throughout the litigation process.
Shareholders can also benefit from following news sources and industry reports related to the MicroStrategy lawsuit and the defendant company. These sources can provide valuable insights into broader market trends, regulatory changes, and public perceptions that may influence the case.
By staying informed, shareholders can better anticipate shifts in the legal and financial landscape, enabling them to adapt their strategies and protect their interests effectively.
In securities class actions, knowledge is power, and staying informed is a key component of successful participation.
Frequently Asked Questions About the MicroStrategy Lawsuit
What initiated the MicroStrategy lawsuit?
The lawsuit was initiated by investors alleging that MicroStrategy provided misleading information regarding its financial health and operations, resulting in financial losses.
How can I join the MicroStrategy lawsuit?
If you purchased shares during the class period and suffered a loss, then you are automatically a member of the class and do not need to do anything at this point unless you are considering moving for lead plaintiff.
What are the potential benefits of a MicroStrategy lawsuit?
Class action lawsuits allow individual investors to collectively seek justice and compensation, which might be challenging to pursue individually. They also promote corporate accountability.
How long will the MicroStrategy lawsuit take to resolve?
The duration of class action lawsuits can vary significantly, depending on the complexity of the case, legal strategies, and whether settlements are reached. It could take several months to years.
Contact Timothy L. Miles Today About a MicroStrategy Class Action Lawsuit
If you suffered losses in MicroStrategy stock, call us today for a free case evaluation about an MicroStrategy class action lawsuit. 855-846-6529 or [email protected] (24/7/365).
Timothy L. Miles, Esq.
Law Offices of Timothy L. Miles
Tapestry at Brentwood Town Center
300 Centerview Dr. #247
Mailbox #1091
Brentwood,TN 37027
Phone: (855) Tim-MLaw (855-846-6529)
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.classactionlawyertn.com
Facebook Linkedin Pinterest youtube
