Introduction to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is a crucial piece of legislation that has profoundly shaped the landscape of corporate governance and securities regulation in the United States. Enacted in the aftermath of the stock market crash of 1929, the Act aims to restore investor confidence through a framework that promotes transparency, accuracy, and accountability in the securities markets.

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 established the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is charged with enforcing federal securities laws and regulating the securities industry. One of its key elements involves the disclosure requirements for publicly traded companies, which ensure that investors have access to essential information needed to make informed investment decisions.

Securities class actions are another significant aspect of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These lawsuits enable groups of investors who have been wronged by fraudulent activities or misinformation to collectively seek redress. By providing a mechanism for holding corporations accountable, securities class actions serve as a vital tool for investor protection and market integrity. They often result in substantial settlements, which can deter corporate misconduct and reinforce the principles of fairness and transparency within the marketplace.

Corporate governance is intricately linked to the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Act’s emphasis on disclosure and transparency compels companies to adopt practices that ensure ethical conduct and responsible management. Effective corporate governance structures are essential for complying with the rigorous standards set forth by the SEC, thereby enhancing investor trust and market stability. The Act also addresses issues such as insider trading, proxy solicitation, and tender offers, further fortifying the regulatory environment in which corporations operate.

In conclusion, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 remains a cornerstone of U.S. financial regulation, underpinning key aspects of securities class actions and corporate governance. Its comprehensive framework has not only provided robust protections for investors but also fostered a more transparent and accountable corporate sector. As we look towards 2025 and beyond, understanding this foundational legislation is essential for navigating the complexities of modern financial markets and ensuring their continued integrity and efficiency.

Key Provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Key provisions of the act

1. Creation of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

2. Regulation of the secondary market

3. Mandatory disclosure for public companies

• Form 10-K: An annual report with a comprehensive summary of the company’s financial performance.
• Form 10-Q: A quarterly report that updates the financial information from the 10-K.
• Form 8-K: A “current report” that must be filed to announce major events relevant to shareholders, such as a change in leadership. 

4. Anti-fraud protections

• Rule 10b-5: Prohibits fraud or misrepresentation in connection with the purchase or sale of a security.
• Insider trading: The act strictly prohibits buying or selling securities based on material, nonpublic information.
• Market manipulation: Prohibits actions that mislead investors about a stock’s true value, such as intentionally inflating or depressing prices.

5. Regulation of market participants

• Broker-dealers: Must register with the SEC and comply with licensing and operational requirements. Most also must register with FINRA, the most prominent SRO.
• Securities exchanges: Exchanges like NYSE and NASDAQ must register with the SEC and implement surveillance to detect manipulation.
• SROs: The SEC provides oversight of SROs like FINRA, which create standards for their members, including broker-dealers. 

6. Tender offers

7. Proxy solicitations

Enforcement and penalties

• Civil penalties: Monetary fines and injunctions to stop illegal activity.
• Administrative sanctions: Revocation of licenses for securities professionals.
• Criminal charges: In cases of willful or reckless misconduct, the Department of Justice can file criminal charges, which can result in imprisonment.
• Private lawsuits: The act also allows private citizens to sue market participants who have defrauded them through securities class action lawsuits.

The act in 2025

• H.R. 4599 and H.R. 3402: Proposed amendments that would require new disclosures from public companies, including sexual harassment claims and information related to proxy advisory firms.
• The TICKER Act (S. 1356): Proposed legislation that would require stock exchanges to identify issuers that are consolidated variable interest entities, targeting potential risks from certain foreign entities.
• National securities exchange applications: The SEC is continuing to evaluate applications for new exchanges, such as the application from Dream Exchange Holdings in 2025.

SEC Rule 10b-5

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Enhanced Corporate Governance

Mandatory disclosure and reporting

• Periodic reporting: Publicly traded companies must file annual (10-K), quarterly (10-Q), and current (8-K) reports with the SEC. These reports give investors continuous access to critical information about the company’s financial health, management, and significant events.
• Transparency of leadership: Reporting requirements also compel companies to disclose information about their officers and directors, including their independence, compensation, and experience, further enhancing corporate governance. This promotes board accountability and helps ensure directors have the necessary qualifications to oversee the company effectively.
• Management discussion and analysis (MD&A): The required filings include the MD&A section, where management explains the company’s financial condition and operating results. This provides additional context beyond the financial statements, enhancing transparency. 

Fair and informed shareholder voting

• Proxy rules: The SEC established proxy rules that govern the information companies must provide to shareholders when soliciting votes for director elections or other corporate actions. This ensures investors have sufficient information to vote intelligently.
• Disclosure of board information: Proxy statements must disclose information about director candidates, their qualifications, and their compensation. This allows shareholders to evaluate the suitability of board members.
• Shareholder proposals: The SEC’s proxy rules also govern when a company must include a shareholder proposal in its proxy statement, allowing investors to raise corporate governance issues. 

Regulation of market behavior

• Anti-fraud provisions: Section 10(b) and the implementing Rule 10b-5 prohibit fraud and deception in securities transactions. This holds corporate insiders and executives accountable for misrepresentations and omissions, deterring illegal actions that harm investors resulting in securities class actions.
• Insider trading prohibitions: The anti-fraud rules prohibit company insiders from trading on material nonpublic information. This promotes market fairness and ensures that management’s fiduciary duty to shareholders is not undermined by self-serving transactions thus enhancing corporate governance.
• Tender offer regulations: The Williams Act amendments to the Exchange Act require bidders seeking to acquire control of a company to disclose their intentions. This helps prevent investors from being coerced into selling their shares and ensures they have time to evaluate the offer thus contributing to more robust corporate governance.

Later enhancements to governance

• Internal controls: SOX significantly reinforced the importance of internal controls and financial reporting standards initially emphasized by the Exchange Act, and required management to assess and report on the effectiveness of these controls.
• Board oversight: SOX mandated the independence of audit committees, empowering them to oversee corporate financial reporting. 

The net effect on corporate governance

• Increased accountability: The law created a structure where management and boards of directors are continuously accountable to the market and investors through ongoing reporting and the threat of legal action for fraudulent behavior.
• Shifted power dynamics: Mandatory disclosure rules empower investors by arming them with data to make sound investment choices and hold management to a higher standard. The proxy rules, in turn, facilitate their involvement in corporate decision-making.
• Promoted market integrity: The enforcement of the act’s provisions instills greater public trust and confidence in the U.S. financial markets, making them more transparent and attractive for investment. 

The Exchange Act’s Effect on Investor Protection and Shareholder Rights

Mandatory disclosure and informed decisions

• Publicly available financial reports: The act requires publicly traded companies to file periodic reports, such as annual Form 10-K and quarterly Form 10-Q, with the SEC. This gives all investors access to the same financial and operational data that corporate insiders possess, reducing the informational advantage of those on the inside.
• EDGAR database: The SEC makes these reports publicly available through its Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) database, ensuring broad access to corporate information.
• Prompt disclosure of material events: Companies must file a Form 8-K to announce significant events, such as changes in leadership or major acquisitions, so that investors are quickly and uniformly informed of important developments. 

Protection against fraud and manipulation

• Anti-fraud Rule 10b-5: This broad anti-fraud rule makes it illegal for any person to use deceptive or manipulative devices in connection with the purchase or sale of a security. This provision serves as the basis for the SEC to prosecute securities fraud and provides an implied right for private investors to sue for damage in security class action lawsuits.
• Insider trading prohibitions: The act strictly prohibits buying or selling securities based on material, nonpublic information. This prevents insiders from profiting unfairly at the expense of ordinary investors.
• Prohibition of market manipulation: The act also prohibits manipulative trading activities, such as creating a false appearance of trading activity to inflate or depress a stock’s price further enhancing investor protection and shareholder rights.

Empowerment of shareholder rights

• Fair proxy solicitations: The act and the SEC’s rules regulate proxy solicitations, ensuring that shareholders receive full and accurate information when asked to vote on corporate matters like electing directors. This allows shareholders to exercise their voting rights in an informed manner.
• Regulation of tender offers: When a party seeks to acquire more than 5% of a company, the act’s provisions (known as the Williams Act) require the bidder to disclose their intentions. This prevents “ambush” takeovers and gives existing shareholders time to evaluate the offer and make an informed decision, providing important investor protection and shareholder rights.
• Whistleblower protection: Later amendments, like those under the Dodd-Frank Act, have established whistleblower programs that incentivize individuals to report securities violations, enhancing the SEC’s ability to uncover and prosecute misconduct.

The role of the SEC

• Enforcement power: The SEC has broad civil and administrative enforcement powers and can refer criminal cases to the Department of Justice. This enforcement power deters fraudulent activities and holds wrongdoers accountable providing better investor protection and shareholder rights.
• Broker and dealer oversight: The act requires market professionals, including brokers and dealers, to register with the SEC and adhere to rules of conduct designed to protect customers.
• Ongoing regulatory evolution: The SEC’s authority allows it to adapt and issue new rules to address emerging market challenges, ensuring that investor protection keeps pace with market innovation.

SEC Enforcement Actions Authorized by the Exchange Act

Civil SEC enforcement actions in federal court

• Enjoin future violations: A court can issue an injunction to prohibit individuals or companies from engaging in further violations of securities laws.
• Impose civil monetary penalties: These penalties can range from hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars, depending on the severity of the violation.
• Order disgorgement: The court can order wrongdoers to give up any ill-gotten gains obtained through illegal conduct. These funds can sometimes be distributed to harmed investors.
• Bar individuals from corporate positions: Individuals found to have violated securities laws may be barred from serving as an officer or director of a public company.
• Appoint a receiver: In federal court cases, the SEC may request the appointment of a receiver to recover and protect assets obtained through illegal activities.

Administrative proceedings

• Cease-and-desist orders: These orders require an individual or company to stop certain activities.
• Industry bans and suspensions: The SEC can bar individuals from associating with any securities firm or revoke a firm’s registration.
• Fines and disgorgement: The Commission can impose monetary penalties and order the repayment of illegal profits. 

Other SEC enforcement tools

• Referral for criminal prosecution: For the most serious and willful violations, the SEC can refer a case to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for criminal prosecution, which can result in imprisonment.
• Trading suspensions: The SEC can temporarily halt trading in a stock to protect investors when it suspects inadequate or inaccurate disclosure which are very strong investor protection and shareholder rights.
• Stop orders: The Commission may issue a stop order to prevent the sale of securities with a deficient or misleading registration statement.
• Public alerts: The SEC maintains alerts, such as the Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE) list, to warn investors about entities that are engaged in unregistered solicitation.

SEC Enforcement against specific violations

• Insider trading: Violations of Rule 10b-5 by individuals who trade on material nonpublic information.
• Accounting fraud: Misleading financial statements and deficient internal controls.
• Market manipulation: Schemes designed to mislead investors about a security’s true value, such as “pump-and-dump” schemes.
• Broker-dealer and investment adviser misconduct: Violations by registered financial professionals, including fraudulent activity, improper fee disclosures, and failures to safeguard client assets.
• Misleading disclosures: False or misleading statements by public companies, including “AI washing” where companies exaggerate their use of artificial intelligence.
• Delinquent filings: The failure of public companies to file their periodic reports on time with the SEC.
• Whistleblower retaliation: Taking action against companies that improperly impede individuals from reporting potential violations to the SEC. 

Other Remedies Available to Private Investors Under the Exchange Act

Remedies for fraud (Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5)

• Made a material misstatement or omission.
• Acted with intent to deceive, manipulate, or defraud (scienter).
• Made the misstatement or omission in connection with the plaintiff’s purchase or sale of a security.
• Caused the plaintiff to rely on the misstatement or omission.
• Caused the plaintiff to suffer an economic loss.
• Remedies: Successful plaintiffs can recover their “out-of-pocket” damages, which is the difference between the price they paid and the true value of the security at the time of purchase. In some cases, courts have also granted rescission, which unwinds the transaction.

Remedies for insider trading (Section 20A)

• Who can sue: Investors who traded the same class of securities contemporaneously with an insider who violated the law.
• What they can recover: The court can award damages of up to three times the insider’s illegal profits made or losses avoided. The insider’s “controlling person,” such as a company, can also be held liable, although this remedy was modified by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA). 

Remedies for market manipulation (Section 9)

• What it covers: This includes schemes to create a false appearance of trading activity or to induce investors to trade by misleading them about the security’s price.
• Challenges: Claims under Section 9 are notoriously difficult to prove because investors must show the defendant acted willfully and that the manipulative activity directly affected the security’s price. 

Remedies for false filings (Section 18(a))

• What it covers: It establishes a cause of action against individuals who made or caused the false statements to be made.
• Limitations: Plaintiffs must prove that they relied on the misstatement, which can be challenging. 

Remedies for proxy violations (Section 14(a))

• Remedies: A private investor can sue for damages after a corporate action, such as a merger, has been consummated based on a misleading proxy statement. Before a vote, an investor may also sue for an injunction to stop the vote.

Remedies for “short-swing” profits (Section 16(b))

• How it works: This is a strict liability provision—the insider’s intent is irrelevant. If the company fails to recover these “short-swing” profits, a shareholder can file a derivative lawsuit on the company’s behalf to recover them. 

Important considerations for private investors

• Securities Class action lawsuits: Many private remedies under the Exchange Act are pursued through securities class actions, which allow a group of investors who were harmed by the same misconduct to sue as a collective.
• PSLRA: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA) raised the pleading standards for many securities fraud claims, making it more difficult for plaintiffs to bring weak lawsuits.
• State law remedies: Federal remedies are not the only option. Investors may also be able to pursue actions under state common law or state securities statutes, which can offer alternative paths to recovery.

Defenses in a Private Action Under Rule 10b-5

Attacking the plaintiff’s burden of proof

• The “total mix” of information: The defense may argue that even if the statement was inaccurate, it was not “material,” meaning it would not have been considered important by a reasonable investor in the “total mix” of available information. This may involve showing that the true facts were already disclosed elsewhere, such as in SEC filings or news reports.
• “Puffery” or opinion: The defense may claim that the statement was simply “corporate optimism” or “mere puffery”—too general or vague to induce a reasonable investor to rely on it.
• No duty to disclose: For claims based on an omission, the defense can argue there was no affirmative duty to disclose the information in question. Generally, there is a duty to disclose only if a company is trading on the information or if disclosure is necessary to make other statements not misleading. 
• The company had a rebust corporate governance framework in place.

• Lack of intent: A defendant can argue that they did not act with the required state of mind, or “scienter”. Negligent conduct is not enough for a Rule 10b-5 claim; a plaintiff must prove either intentional or, at a minimum, reckless conduct. This is a major issue in securities class actions.
• Alternative explanations: Under the PSLRA, a court must consider other plausible, non-culpable explanations for the defendant’s conduct. The inference of fraud must be “cogent and at least as compelling as any opposing inference“. 

• Rebutting “fraud-on-the-market”: In securities class action lawsuits, a plaintiff often relies on the “fraud-on-the-market” theory, which presumes that investors rely on a market price that reflects all public information. A defendant can rebut this presumption by proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the alleged misrepresentation had no impact on the stock’s market price.
• Rebutting reliance on omissions: In cases involving alleged omissions, reliance is presumed. However, the defense can still argue that the plaintiff would not have acted differently even if the information had been disclosed.
• Truth-on-the-market: The defense can argue that the market was already aware of the allegedly concealed information through other sources, negating any reliance on the defendant’s omissions. 

• No link to loss: A defendant can argue that the alleged misstatement or omission did not actually cause the plaintiff’s financial loss. To prove this, the defense can show that the stock price dropped for reasons unrelated to the fraud, such as a market-wide decline or a negative news story about a different issue.
• No corrective disclosure: The defense can point out the absence of a “corrective disclosure”—a moment when the truth became known and caused a negative market reaction.

Procedural and statutory defenses

• Private Rule 10b-5 claims must be brought within two years of discovering the facts constituting the violation and no more than five years after the violation occurred. A defendant can argue that the plaintiff’s claim, including a lack of internal controls and corporate governance, is untimely.

• Under the PSLRA, a defendant can use the “safe harbor” provision, which protects companies from liability for forward-looking statements (e.g., projections of future performance) if they are accompanied by “meaningful cautionary statements” even if referring to internal controls or corporate governance

• An individual sued as a “controlling person” under Section 20(a) can argue that they lacked the power to direct or cause the direction of the controlled person’s management and policies.
• Good faith defense: A controlling person can also claim they acted in good faith and did not directly or indirectly induce the controlled person’s violation. 

• Defendants can challenge the court’s jurisdiction by arguing that the claim involves securities transactions that occurred outside the United States, which fall beyond the reach of Rule 10b-5. 

The Exchange Act and Reporting Requirements

• Listing a security on a national securities exchange.
• Reaching certain asset and shareholder thresholds (e.g., more than $10 million in assets and over 2,000 shareholders, or 500 or more non-accredited investors).

Types of required reports

Periodic reports

• Form 10-K (Annual Report): The most comprehensive periodic filing, due within 60 to 90 days after a company’s fiscal year-end, depending on its size. It includes:
  • An overview of the company’s business operations.
  • Audited financial statements.
  • A Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) of the company’s financial condition and results of operations.
  • Disclosure of risk factors.
• Form 10-Q (Quarterly Report): Filed for the first three fiscal quarters and includes unaudited financial statements, MD&A, and updates on business operations.
• Form 8-K (Current Report): Notifies investors of unscheduled material events. It is generally required within four business days of the event and covers major items such as acquisitions or dispositions of assets, changes in leadership, and bankruptcy.

Beneficial ownership reporting requirements

• Schedule 13D: Requires any person or group that acquires beneficial ownership of more than 5% of a class of a company’s voting stock to file a Schedule 13D. The filing must disclose the purpose of the acquisition and any plans related to the company.
• Schedule 13G: A shorter, less burdensome alternative to Schedule 13D for certain institutional investors or passive investors who are not seeking to exercise control over the company.
• Forms 3, 4, and 5 (Section 16 Filings): Insiders—defined as officers, directors, and 10% beneficial owners—must report their holdings and transactions in company stock. This reporting requirement controls:
  • Form 3: Filed when an individual first becomes an insider.
  • Form 4: Filed within two business days of a change in ownership.
  • Form 5: An annual statement to report any transactions not previously reported. 

Proxy solicitation reporting requirements

• Proxy Statement (Schedule 14A): Companies must provide shareholders with a proxy statement before soliciting votes for director elections or other corporate actions.
• Required Disclosures: The proxy statement must disclose information about the matters to be voted on, director nominees, executive compensation, and other corporate governance details. 

The public filing system and reporting requirements

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA)

Key changes introduced by the PSLRA include:

• Heightened pleading standards: Plaintiffs must state their claims with much more specificity, detailing which statements were misleading and why, and alleging that the defendants acted with the requisite state of mind (scienter).
• “Lead Plaintiff” provision: Instead of the first person to file a complaint controlling the litigation, courts now appoint a “lead plaintiff”—the investor or group with the largest financial stake—to represent the class. This was intended to empower institutional investors and ensure the class’s interests are vigorously represented.
• Stay of discovery: The PSLRA mandates an automatic stay on discovery—the gathering of evidence—while a motion to dismiss is pending. This prevents plaintiffs from using the expensive discovery process to pressure companies into a quick settlement.
• Limitations on damages: The Act caps damages in many fraud-on-the-market cases to account for stock price drops that may be unrelated to the alleged fraud.

The securities class actions process

1. Investigation phase: After a negative event, such as a sharp drop in stock price or an announcement of financial misconduct, a plaintiff’s law firm will investigate potential claims.
2. Filing the complaint: If the firm finds evidence of fraud, it will file a complaint on behalf of a named plaintiff. A notice of the lawsuit is published to alert other potential class members.
3. Appointing a lead plaintiff: Within 90 days of the notice, the court appoints a lead plaintiff to manage the litigation and select lead counsel.
4. Motion to dismiss: The defendant corporation will typically file a motion to dismiss, arguing the complaint does not meet the PSLRA’s heightened pleading standards.
5. Discovery (if motion fails): If the motion to dismiss is denied, the stay is lifted, and the discovery process begins. The class will gather documents and take depositions.
6. Class certification: The court must certify that the case meets the requirements for a class action, such as typicality of claims and adequacy of representation.
7. Settlement or trial: The vast majority of these cases are resolved through settlement. If a settlement is reached, the lead plaintiff and lead counsel will negotiate the terms on behalf of the class, which must be approved by the court. Only a very small percentage of cases go to trial.

Common claims in securities class actions

• Fraud (Rule 10b-5): The most common claim in security class actions is that a company or its insiders made material misstatements or omissions that artificially inflated the company’s stock price. When the truth is revealed, the price drops, and investors sue to recover their losses.
• Merger-objection claims: In some cases, lawsuits are filed alleging that disclosures related to a merger or acquisition were materially misleading.
• “Control Person” liability (Section 20(a)): Executives and directors who control individuals who violate the Exchange Act can be held jointly and severally liable.

Conclusion

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 stands as a cornerstone in the regulation of securities markets in the United States. This pivotal legislation established the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which has since been integral in enforcing securities laws and ensuring market integrity. One of the hallmark features of the Act is its provision for securities class actions, which enable groups of investors to collectively bring lawsuits against companies or individuals who have committed securities fraud.

This mechanism not only empowers individual investors but also serves as a powerful deterrent against fraudulent activities within the market. Over the years, securities class actions have played a crucial role in maintaining transparency and accountability in the financial markets.

In addition to facilitating class actions, the SEC enforcement authority under the Exchange Act  is instrumental in maintaining fair and orderly markets. The SEC Enforcement Division is tasked with investigating potential violations of securities laws, bringing civil enforcement actions, and working closely with other law enforcement agencies to prosecute criminal cases.

Through these efforts, the SEC ensures that those who engage in deceptive practices are held accountable, thereby fostering investor confidence and promoting market stability. The SEC’s role in enforcement has evolved over the decades, adapting to new challenges and complexities brought about by technological advancements and globalization.

The act’s comprehensive framework covers various aspects of securities trading, including registration requirements, periodic reporting by publicly traded companies, and prohibitions against insider trading and market manipulation. These provisions collectively aim to protect investors by ensuring that they have access to accurate and timely information needed to make informed decisions. The regulatory landscape shaped by the  Exchange Act continues to evolve, responding to emerging threats and adapting to the dynamic nature of financial markets.

In conclusion, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 has been instrumental in shaping the U.S. securities market by establishing a robust regulatory framework and empowering the SEC with significant enforcement capabilities. Through mechanisms like securities class actions and rigorous SEC Enforcement, the Act has fostered a more transparent, fair, and trustworthy market environment.

As we look ahead to 2025 and beyond, the principles enshrined in this historic legislation will continue to underpin efforts to safeguard investor interests and uphold market integrity amid an ever-changing financial landscape.

Visit Our Extensive Investor Hub: Learning for Informed Investors